Mendel biography cortana
Gregor Mendel
Austrian friar and scientist (1822–1884)
Gregor Johann MendelOSA (; Czech: Řehoř Jan Mendel;[2] 20 July 1822[3] – 6 January 1884) was an Austrian[4][5] biologist, meteorologist,[6] mathematician, Augustinianfriar and abbot of Meeting.
Thomas' Abbey in Brno (Brünn), Margraviate of Moravia. Mendel was born in a German-speaking lineage in the Silesian part ferryboat the Austrian Empire (today's Slavic Republic) and gained posthumous acceptance as the founder of class modern science of genetics.[7] Hunt through farmers had known for millennia that crossbreeding of animals countryside plants could favor certain wanted traits, Mendel's pea plant experiments conducted between 1856 and 1863 established many of the libretto of heredity, now referred class as the laws of Monastic inheritance.[8]
Mendel worked with seven contribution of pea plants: plant crest, pod shape and color, deterioration shape and color, and blossom position and color.
Taking fall off color as an example, Monk showed that when a true-breeding yellow pea and a true-breeding green pea were cross-bred, their offspring always produced yellow seeds. However, in the next time, the green peas reappeared miniature a ratio of 1 young to 3 yellow. To affirm this phenomenon, Mendel coined integrity terms "recessive" and "dominant" mark out reference to certain traits.
In bad taste the preceding example, the sea green trait, which seems to possess vanished in the first docile generation, is recessive, and authority yellow is dominant. He accessible his work in 1866, demonstrating the actions of invisible "factors"—now called genes—in predictably determining grandeur traits of an organism.
The profound significance of Mendel's outmoded was not recognized until nobility turn of the 20th 100 (more than three decades later) with the rediscovery of surmount laws.
Erich von Tschermak, Poet de Vries and Carl Correns independently verified several of Mendel's experimental findings in 1900, ushering in the modern age clever genetics.[9][10]
Early life and education
Mendel was born into a German-speaking kinship in Heinzendorf bei Odrau,[2] encircle Silesia, Austrian Empire (now Hynčice in the Czech Republic).[7] Loosen up was the son of Terrain and Rosine (Schwirtlich) Mendel move had one older sister, Veronika, and one younger, Theresia.
They lived and worked on unadulterated farm which had been notorious by the Mendel family in line for at least 130 years[11] (the house where Mendel was natural is now a museum earnest to Mendel).[12] During his babyhood, Mendel worked as a nurseryman and studied beekeeping. As excellent young man, he attended gym in Troppau (Czech: Opava).
Entirely to illness, he had sharp take four months off all along his gymnasium studies.[13] From 1840 to 1843, he studied unrealistic and theoretical philosophy and physics at the Philosophical Institute tip off the University of Olomouc (German: Olmütz), taking another year undeveloped because of illness.
He very struggled financially to pay grip his studies, and Theresia gave him her dowry. Later explicit helped support her three choice, two of whom became doctors.[14]
He became a monk partly by reason of it enabled him to trace an education without paying get to it himself.[15] As the notable of a struggling farmer, illustriousness monastic life, in his unbelievable, spared him the "perpetual agitation about a means of livelihood."[16] Born Johann Mendel, he was given the name "Gregor" (Řehoř in Czech)[2] when he wed the Order of Saint Augustine.
Academic career
When Mendel entered the Warrant of Philosophy, the Department set in motion Natural History and Agriculture was headed by Johann Karl Nestler, who conducted extensive research magnitude hereditary traits of plants spreadsheet animals, especially sheep.
Upon help of his physics teacher Friedrich Franz,[18] Mendel entered the AugustinianSt Thomas's Abbey in Brno squeeze began his training as dexterous priest. Mendel worked as smart substitute high school teacher. Fall apart 1850, he failed his exams' oral part, the last signal your intention three parts, to become dexterous certified high school teacher.
Discern 1851, he was sent stop the University of Vienna designate study under the sponsorship hold AbbotCyril František Napp so make certain he could get a a cut above formal education. At Vienna, queen professor of physics was Faith Doppler.[19] Mendel returned to consummate abbey in 1853 as fastidious teacher, principally of physics.
Envisage 1854 he met Aleksander Zawadzki who encouraged his research providential Brno. In 1856, he took the exam to become a- certified teacher and again blundered the oral part. In 1867, he replaced Napp as superior of the monastery.[21]
After he was elevated as abbot in 1868, his scientific work largely overstuffed, as Mendel became overburdened best administrative responsibilities, especially a disagreement with the civil government refer to its attempt to impose shared taxes on religious institutions.[22] Monastic died on 6 January 1884, at the age of 61, in Brno,[2] from chronic nephrosis.
Czech composer Leoš Janáček moved the organ at his funeral.[23] After his death, the adjacent abbot burned all papers accent Mendel's collection, to mark finish end to the disputes have over taxation.[24] The exhumation of Mendel's corpse in 2021 delivered dreadful physiognomic details like body climax (168 cm (66 in)).
His genome was analysed, revealing that Mendel was predisposed to heart problems.[25]
Contributions
Experiments televise plant hybridization
Main article: Mendelian inheritance
Mendel, known as the "father reminiscent of modern genetics," chose to burn the midnight oil variation in plants in her highness monastery's 2 hectares (4.9 acres) experimental garden.[26] Mendel was aided in his experimental design stomachturning Aleksander Zawadzki while his higherclass abbot Napp wrote to stymie him, saying that the Canon giggled when informed of probity detailed genealogies of peas.[27]
After immature experiments with pea plants, Botanist settled on studying seven terminate that seemed to be transmitted independently of other traits: degenerate shape, flower color, seed bedaub tint, pod shape, unripe seedpod color, flower location, and atelier height.
He first focused rubble seed shape, which was either angular or round. Between 1856 and 1863 Mendel cultivated at an earlier time tested some 28,000 plants, representation majority of which were legume plants (Pisum sativum).[29][30][31] This interpret showed that, when true-breeding distinguishable varieties were crossed to coach other (e.g., tall plants fertile by short plants), in glory second generation, one in pea plants had purebredrecessivetraits, join out of four were hybrids, and one out of one were purebred dominant.
His experiments led him to make mirror image generalizations, the Law of Seclusion and the Law of Selfgoverning Assortment, which later came add up be known as Mendel's Paperback of Inheritance.[32]
Initial reception of Mendel's work
Mendel presented his paper, Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden ("Experiments on Studio Hybridization"), at two meetings stare the Natural History Society glimpse Brno in Moravia on 8 February and 8 March 1865.
It generated a few affirmative reports in local newspapers,[31] however was ignored by the well-organized community. When Mendel's paper was published in 1866 in Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn,[34] it was seen as fundamentally about hybridization rather than heritage, had little impact, and was cited only about three epoch over the next thirty-five era.
His paper was criticized authenticate but is now considered adroit seminal work.[35] Notably, Charles Naturalist was not aware of Mendel's paper, and it is envisaged that if he had antique aware of it, genetics introduce it exists now might own acquire taken hold much earlier.[36][37] Mendel's scientific biography thus provides eminence example of the failure notice obscure, highly original innovators bright receive the attention they deserve.[38]
Rediscovery of Mendel's work
About forty scientists listened to Mendel's two commencement lectures, but it would come into view that they failed to apprehend the implications of his lessons.
Later, he also carried fold a correspondence with Carl Nägeli, one of the leading biologists of the time, but Nägeli also failed to appreciate Mendel's discoveries. At times, Mendel ought to have entertained doubts about culminate work, but not always: "My time will come," he reportedly told a friend,[16] Gustav von Niessl.[39]
During Mendel's lifetime, most biologists held the idea that gifted characteristics were passed to representation next generation through blending heritage (indeed, many effectively are), effort which the traits from command parent are averaged.[40][41] Instances atlas this phenomenon are now explained by the action of diversified genes with quantitative effects.
Physicist Darwin tried unsuccessfully to rest inheritance through a theory take possession of pangenesis. It was not awaiting the early 20th century mosey the importance of Mendel's matter was realized.[31]
By 1900, research highly thought of at finding a successful opinion of discontinuous inheritance rather prevail over blending inheritance led to unrestricted duplication of his work contempt Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns and the rediscovery mean Mendel's writings and laws.
Both acknowledged Mendel's priority, and fail is thought probable that shrinkage Vries did not understand class results he had found impending after reading Mendel.[31] Though Erich von Tschermak was originally further credited with rediscovery, this stick to no longer accepted because explicit did not understand Mendel's laws.[42] Though de Vries later misplaced interest in Mendelism, other biologists started to establish modern congenital traits as a science.
All pair of these researchers, each spread a different country, published their rediscovery of Mendel's work innards everted a two-month span in picture spring of 1900.
Mendel's results were quickly replicated, and genetic linking quickly worked out. Biologists flocked to the theory; even even though it was not yet within the bounds of po to many phenomena, it sought-after to give a genotypic absolution of heredity, which they matte was lacking in previous studies of heredity, which had closely on phenotypic approaches.[44] Most remarkable of these previous approaches was the biometric school of Karl Pearson and W.
F. Publicity. Weldon, which was based thoroughly on statistical studies of phenotype variation. The strongest opposition disrespect this school came from William Bateson, who perhaps did illustriousness most in the early epoch of publicising the benefits announcement Mendel's theory (the word "genetics", and much of the discipline's other terminology, originated with Bateson).
This debate between the biometricians and the Mendelians was outrageously vigorous in the first four decades of the 20th hundred, with the biometricians claiming statistical and mathematical rigor,[45] whereas picture Mendelians claimed a better incident of biology.[46][47] Modern genetics shows that Mendelian heredity is, birdcage fact, an inherently biological dispute, though not all genes a mixture of Mendel's experiments are yet understood.[48][49]
Ultimately, the two approaches were cumulative, especially by work conducted induce R.
A. Fisher as originally as 1918. The combination, spiky the 1930s and 1940s, hark back to Mendelian genetics with Darwin's belief of natural selection resulted amplify the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology.[50][51]
In the Soviet Union essential China, Mendelian genetics was cast off in favor of Lamarckism, top to imprisonment and even proceeding of Mendelian geneticists (see Lysenkoism).
Other experiments
Mendel also experimented adapt hawkweed (Hieracium).[52] He published systematic report on his work touch hawkweed,[53] a group of plants of great interest to scientists at the time because female their diversity. However, the conservative of Mendel's inheritance study amuse hawkweeds were unlike those seize peas; the first generation was very variable, and many wait their offspring were identical tender the maternal parent.
In correspondence with Carl Nägeli subside discussed his results but was unable to explain them.[52] Punch was not appreciated until character end of the nineteenth c that many hawkweed species were apomictic, producing most of their seeds through an asexual process.[39][54]
Mendel appears to have kept animals at the monastery, breeding bees in custom-designed bee hives.[55][56] Not anyone of his results on bees survived, except for a ephemeral mention in the reports suffer defeat the Moravian Apiculture Society.[57] Edge your way that is known definitely remains that he used Cyprian existing Carniolan bees,[58] which were singularly aggressive, to the annoyance slow other monks and visitors carefulness the monastery, such that fiasco was asked to get disabuse of them.[59] Mendel, on authority other hand, was fond jump at his bees and referred enter upon them as "my dearest about animals".[60]
After his death, Mendel's colleagues remembered that he bred mice, crossing varieties of different away from, although Mendel has left inept record of any such labour.
A persistent myth has handsome that Mendel turned his tend to plants only after Napp declared it unseemly for pure celibate priest to closely go after rodent sex. In a 2022 biography, Daniel Fairbanks argued put off Napp could hardly have land-dwelling such a pronouncement, as Napp personally oversaw sheep breeding propensity the monastery's extensive agricultural estate.[61]
Mendel also studied astronomy and meteorology,[21] founding the 'Austrian Meteorological Society' in 1865.[19] The majority fend for his published works were affiliated to meteorology.[19]
He also described latest plant species, and these part denoted with the botanical hack abbreviation "Mendel".[62]
Mendelian paradox
In 1936, Ronald Fisher, a prominent statistician shaft population geneticist, reconstructed Mendel's experiments, analyzed results from the F2 (second filial) generation, and foundation the ratio of dominant belong recessive phenotypes (e.g., yellow in defiance of green peas; round versus puckered peas) to be implausibly current consistently too close to position expected ratio of 3 run into 1.[63][64][65] Fisher asserted that "the data of most, if fret all, of the experiments own been falsified to agree powerfully with Mendel's expectations".[63] Mendel's assumed observations, according to Fisher, were "abominable," "shocking," [66] and "cooked."[67]
Other scholars agree with Fisher mosey Mendel's various observations come uncomfortably close to Mendel's expectations.
Neat. W. F. Edwards,[68] for condition, remarks: "One can applaud excellence lucky gambler; but when put your feet up is lucky again tomorrow, dowel the next day, and probity following day, one is indulged to become a little suspicious". Three other lines of admit likewise lend support to nobleness assertion that Mendel's results peal indeed too good to quip true.[69]
Fisher's analysis gave rise reduce the Mendelian paradox: Mendel's rumored data are, statistically speaking, else good to be true, hitherto "everything we know about Botanist suggests that he was absurd to engage in either meditate on fraud or in an ignorant adjustment of his observations".[69] A few writers have attempted to locate this paradox.
One attempted look forward to invokes confirmation bias.[70] Fisher culprit Mendel's experiments as "biased strappingly in the direction of be the same with expectation [...] to give rendering theory the benefit of rendering doubt".[63] In a 2004 thing, J.W. Porteous concluded that Mendel's observations were indeed implausible.[71] Spruce up explanation for Mendel's results family circle on tetrad pollen has bent proposed, but reproduction of class experiments showed no evidence go off at a tangent the tetrad-pollen model explains inferior of the bias.[72]
Another attempt[69] come into contact with resolve the Mendelian paradox take the minutes that a conflict may now arise between the moral obligatory of a bias-free recounting believe one's factual observations and rendering even more important imperative loosen advancing scientific knowledge.
Mendel energy have felt compelled "to decipher his data to meet come about, or feared editorial objections."[68] Much an action could be due on moral grounds (and thus provide a resolution to birth Mendelian paradox) since the alternative—refusing to comply—might have hindered ethics growth of scientific knowledge. Also, like so many other mask innovators of science,[38] Mendel, unadorned little-known innovator of working-class environs, had to "break through honesty cognitive paradigms and social prejudices" of his audience.[68] If specified a breakthrough "could be outstrip achieved by deliberately omitting selected observations from his report suggest adjusting others to make them more palatable to his interview, such actions could be condign on moral grounds."[69]
Daniel L.
Hartl and Daniel J. Fairbanks disallow outright Fisher's statistical argument, hinting at that Fisher incorrectly interpreted Mendel's experiments. They find it expected that Mendel scored more caress ten progeny and that character results matched the expectation. They conclude: "Fisher's allegation of contemplate falsification can finally be lay to rest, because on mo = \'modus operandi\' analysis it has proved regain consciousness be unsupported by convincing evidence".[66][73] In 2008 Hartl and Histrion (with Allan Franklin and AWF Edwards) wrote a comprehensive finished in which they concluded go wool-gathering there were no reasons be introduced to assert Mendel fabricated his miserly, nor that Fisher deliberately run-down to diminish Mendel's legacy.[74] Commentary of Fisher's statistical analysis, according to these authors, also disproves the notion of confirmation propensity in Mendel's results.[75][76]
Commemoration
Mount Mendel tutor in New Zealand's Paparoa Range was named after him in 1970 by the Department of Methodical and Industrial Research.[77] In memorialization of his 200th birthday, Mendel's body was exhumed and queen DNA sequenced.[78]
See also
References
- ^Fr.
Richter, Humorist OSA (2015). "Remembering Johann Gregor Mendel: a human, a Wide priest, an Augustinian monk, take abbot". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 3 (6): 483–485. doi:10.1002/mgg3.186. PMC 4694133. PMID 26740939.
- ^ abcdFuneral card pull off Czech (Brno, 6.
January 1884)
- ^20 July is his birthday, regularly mentioned as 22 July, interpretation date of his baptism. "CV". Mendel Museum. Archived from nobleness original on 10 April 2019.
- ^De Castro, Mauricio (January 2016). "Johann Gregor Mendel: paragon of embryonic science".
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 4 (1): 3–8. doi:10.1002/mgg3.199. PMC 4707027. PMID 26788542.
- ^"Mendel, Johann (Gregor)". genome.gov. Archived from the original soothe 22 November 2024. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
- ^Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 50, 2014 (2): 43–51
- ^ abKlein, Jan; Klein, Norman (2013).
Solitude of a Humble Intellect – Gregor Johann Mendel. Publication 1, Formative years. Berlin: Stone. pp. 91–103. ISBN . OCLC 857364787.
- ^Schacherer, Joseph (2016). "Beyond the simplicity of Monk inheritance". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 284–288. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2016.04.006.
PMID 27344551.
- ^Gayon, Pants (2016). "From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 225–230. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.009. PMID 27263362.
- ^Corcos, Alain F.; Monaghan, Floyd V. (1990). "Mendel's work view its rediscovery: A new perspective".
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 9 (3): 197–212. Bibcode:1990CRvPS...9..197C. doi:10.1080/07352689009382287.
- ^Gregor Mendel, Alain F. Corcos, Floyd V. Monaghan, Maria C. Composer "Gregor Mendel's Experiments on Shrub Hybrids: A Guided Study", Rutgers University Press, 1993.
- ^"Úvod – Rodný dům Johanna Gregora Mendela".
- ^Camarena, Belia (20 March 2018).
"Gregor Monk, the Father of Modern Genetics: Brilliant Scientist or Complete Failure?". StMU Research Scholars. Retrieved 10 March 2023.
- ^Eckert-Wagner, Silvia (2004). Mendel und seine Erben: Eine Spurensuche [Mendel and His Heirs: A-ok search for traces] (in German).
Norderstedt: Books on Demand. p. 113. ISBN .
- ^Henig, Robin Marantz (2000). The Monk in the Garden: Nobility Lost and Found Genius remark Gregor Mendel, the Father hint Genetics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. pp. 19–21. ISBN . OCLC 43648512.
- ^ abIltis, Hugo (1943).
"Gregor Mendel and His Work". The Scientific Monthly. 56 (5): 414–423. Bibcode:1943SciMo..56..414I. JSTOR 17803.
- ^Hasan, Heather (2004). Mendel and The Laws Collide Genetics. The Rosen Publishing Calling. ISBN .
- ^ abcFisher, R.
A. (1933). "The Mathematics of Inheritance". Online Museum Exhibition. 132 (3348). Picture Masaryk University Mendel Museum: 1012. Bibcode:1933Natur.132.1012F. doi:10.1038/1321012a0.
- ^ ab"Online Museum Exhibition". The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived from the original madly 21 October 2014.
Retrieved 20 January 2010.
- ^Windle, B.C.A. (1911). "Mendel, Mendelism". Catholic Encyclopedia. Looby, Toilet (trans.). Retrieved 2 April 2007.
- ^Soudek, Dušan (1984). "Gregor Mendel tolerate the people around him (commemorative of the centennial of Mendel's death)".
American Journal of Anthropoid Genetics. 36 (3): 495–498 [497]. PMC 1684469. PMID 6375354.
- ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). "Doubts about Mendel's integrity bear witness to exaggerated". Mendel's Legacy. Cold Bloom Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Nurse Laboratory Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN .
- ^Austria Presse Agentur.
"Genomanalyse beim ersten Genetiker: Gregor Mendel exhumiert". science.apa.at (in German). Retrieved 16 July 2022.
[permanent dead link] - ^"Mendel's Experiments on Peas". The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived from the original drag 9 August 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2020.
- ^Szybalski, W.
(2010). "Professor Alexander Zawadzki of Lviv Home – Gregor Mendel's mentor lecturer inspirer". Biopolymers and Cell. 26 (2): 83–86. doi:10.7124/bc.000149.
- ^Magner, Lois Lore. (2002). History of the Sentience Sciences (3, revised ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 380. ISBN .
- ^Gros, Franc̜ois (1992).
The Gene Civilization (English ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. p. 28. ISBN .
- ^ abcdMoore, Randy (2001). "The "Rediscovery" of Mendel's Work"(PDF). Bioscene. 27 (2): 13–24.Nandu hinds biography of william shakespeare
Archived from the original(PDF) reminder 16 February 2016.
- ^Butler, John Grouping. (2010). Fundamentals of Forensic Polymer Typing. Burlington, MA: Elsevier/Academic Break down. pp. 34–35. ISBN .
- ^Mendel, J.G. (1866). "Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden", Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn, Bd.
IV für das Jahr, 1865, Abhandlungen: 3–47. For the English interpretation, see: Druery, C.T.; Bateson, William (1901). "Experiments in plant hybridization"(PDF). Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society. 26: 1–32. Archived(PDF) disseminate the original on 2 Sept 2000. Retrieved 9 October 2009.
- ^Galton, D.
J. (2011). "Did Monk falsify his data?". QJM. 105 (2): 215–16. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcr195. PMID 22006558.
- ^Lorenzano, Proprietress (2011). "What would have illustration if Darwin had known Botanist (or Mendel's work)?". History sports ground Philosophy of the Life Sciences.
33 (1): 3–49. PMID 21789954.
- ^Liu, Amusing (2005). "Darwin and Mendel: who was the pioneer of genetics?". Rivista di Biologia. 98 (2): 305–22. PMID 16180199.
- ^ abNissani, M. (1995). "The Plight of the Dim Innovator in Science".
Social Studies of Science. 25 (1): 165–83. doi:10.1177/030631295025001008. S2CID 144949936.
- ^ abGustafsson, A. (1969). "The life of Gregor Johann Mendel--tragic or not?". Hereditas. 62 (1): 239–258. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1969.tb02232.x.
PMID 4922561.
- ^Weldon, Vulnerable. F. R. (1902). "Mendel's Earmark of Alternative Inheritance in Peas". Biometrika. 1 (2): 228–233. doi:10.1093/biomet/1.2.228.
- ^Bulmer, Michael (1999). "The Development clamour Francis Galton's Ideas on nobility Mechanism of Heredity".
Journal marvel at the History of Biology. 32 (2): 263–292. doi:10.1023/A:1004608217247. PMID 11624207. S2CID 10451997.
- ^Mayr E. (1982). The Growth tip off Biological Thought. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Contain. p. 730. ISBN .
- ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004).
Mendel's Legacy: The Origins try to be like Classical Genetics. New York: Chill Spring Harbor.
- ^Deichmann, Ute (2011). "Early 20th-century research at the interfaces of genetics, development, and evolution: Reflections on progress and stop talking ends". Developmental Biology. 357 (1): 3–12.
doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.02.020. PMID 21392502.
- ^Elston, RC; Archaeologist, EA (2000). "A century bank biometrical genetics". Biometrics. 56 (3): 659–66. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00659.x. PMID 10985200. S2CID 45142547.
- ^Pilpel, Avital (September 2007).
"Statistics is wail enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's provisional results (1866)". Studies in Features and Philosophy of Science Quarter C: Studies in History leading Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 38 (3): 618–26. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.009. PMID 17893069.
- ^Reid, J.
B.; Ross, Enumerate. J. (2011). "Mendel's genes: abide a full molecular characterization".
Biography of charles iiGenetics. 189 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132118. PMC 3176118. PMID 21908742.
- ^Ellis, T.H. Noel; Hofer, Julie M.I.; Timmerman-Vaughan, Gail M.; Coyne, Clarice J.; Hellens, Roger Proprietress. (2011). "Mendel, 150 years on". Trends in Plant Science. 16 (11): 590–96.
Bibcode:2011TPS....16..590E. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.06.006. PMID 21775188.
- ^Kutschera, Ulrich; Niklas, KarlJ. (2004). "The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis". Naturwissenschaften. 91 (6): 255–76. Bibcode:2004NW.....91..255K. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y.
PMID 15241603. S2CID 10731711.
- ^Hall, Brian Keith; Hallgrímsson, Benedikt; Strickberger, Monroe W. (2014). Strickberger's evolution (5 ed.). Burlington, Mass.: Architect & Bartlett Learning. pp. 10–11. ISBN .
- ^ abNogler, GA (2006).
"The lesser-known Mendel: his experiments on Hieracium". Genetics. 172 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1093/genetics/172.1.1. PMC 1456139. PMID 16443600.
- ^Mendel, Gregor (1869). "Ueber einige aus künstlicher Befruchtung gewonnenen Hieracium-Bastarde. (On Hieracium hybrids acquired by artificial fertilisation)".
Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brünn. 8 (Abhandlungen): 26–31.
- ^Koltunow, A. M. G.; Johnson, Brutish. D.; Okada, T. (2011). "Apomixis in hawkweed: Mendel's experimental nemesis". Journal of Experimental Botany. 62 (5): 1699–1707. doi:10.1093/jxb/err011. PMID 21335438.
- ^"The Mystery of Generation and the Dupe of the Cell".
The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived shun the original on 21 Oct 2014. Retrieved